Top 10 Problem Solvers & Dividers in Congress

A weekly rundown of the top (and bottom) players in America's most popular full-contact sport: politics.

Democrat

Builders
dividers
of the week
Jennifer Wexton
Jennifer Wexton

Jennifer Wexton

REP
SEN
VA-10
Eric Swalwell
Eric Swalwell

Eric Swalwell

REP
SEN
CA-14
Susan Wild
Susan Wild

Susan Wild

REP
SEN
PA-7
Mark Pocan
Mark Pocan

Mark Pocan

REP
SEN
WI-2
Mark Warner
Mark Warner

Mark Warner

REP
SEN
VA
Hakeem Jeffries
Hakeem Jeffries

Hakeem Jeffries

REP
SEN
NY-8
Bonnie Watson Coleman
Bonnie Watson Coleman

Bonnie Watson Coleman

REP
SEN
NJ-12
James McGovern
James McGovern

James McGovern

REP
SEN
MA-2
Elizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Warren

Elizabeth Warren

REP
SEN
MA
Pramila Jayapal
Pramila Jayapal

Pramila Jayapal

REP
SEN
WA-7
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5

Republican

Builders
Dividers
of the week
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Todd Young

Todd Young

REP
SEN
IN
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Clay Higgins

Clay Higgins

REP
SEN
LA-1/3/00
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Brandon Williams

Brandon Williams

REP
SEN
NY-22
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Lance Gooden

Lance Gooden

REP
SEN
TX-5
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Bruce Westerman

Bruce Westerman

REP
SEN
AR-4
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Andrew Clyde

Andrew Clyde

REP
SEN
GA-9
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Ryan Zinke

Ryan Zinke

REP
SEN
MT-1
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Mary Miller

Mary Miller

REP
SEN
IL-15
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Michael Waltz

Michael Waltz

REP
SEN
FL-6
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Marjorie Greene

Marjorie Greene

REP
SEN
GA-14

Democrat

Builders
dividers
of the week
Jon Ossoff
Jon Ossoff

Jon Ossoff

REP
SEN
GA
Patty Murray
Patty Murray

Patty Murray

REP
SEN
WA
Jacky Rosen
Jacky Rosen

Jacky Rosen

REP
SEN
NV
Hakeem Jeffries
Hakeem Jeffries

Hakeem Jeffries

REP
SEN
NY-8
Colin Allred
Colin Allred

Colin Allred

REP
SEN
TX-32
Pramila Jayapal
Pramila Jayapal

Pramila Jayapal

REP
SEN
WA-7
Mark Kelly
Mark Kelly

Mark Kelly

REP
SEN
AZ
Eric Swalwell
Eric Swalwell

Eric Swalwell

REP
SEN
CA-14
Sharice Davids
Sharice Davids

Sharice Davids

REP
SEN
KS-3
Lloyd Doggett
Lloyd Doggett

Lloyd Doggett

REP
SEN
TX-37
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5

Republican

Builders
Dividers
of the week
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Lori Chavez-DeRemer

Lori Chavez-DeRemer

REP
SEN
OR-5
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Lance Gooden

Lance Gooden

REP
SEN
TX-5
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Brian Fitzpatrick

Brian Fitzpatrick

REP
SEN
PA-1
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Mary Miller

Mary Miller

REP
SEN
IL-15
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Zachary (Zach) Nunn

Zachary (Zach) Nunn

REP
SEN
IA-3
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Andrew Ogles

Andrew Ogles

REP
SEN
TN-5
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Young Kim

Young Kim

REP
SEN
CA-40
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Ron Johnson

Ron Johnson

REP
SEN
WI
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Todd Young

Todd Young

REP
SEN
IN
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Josh Brecheen

Josh Brecheen

REP
SEN
OK-2

Democrat

Builders
dividers
of the week
Jon Ossoff
Jon Ossoff

Jon Ossoff

REP
SEN
GA
Eric Swalwell
Eric Swalwell

Eric Swalwell

REP
SEN
CA-14
Maggie Hassan
Maggie Hassan

Maggie Hassan

REP
SEN
NH
Gwen Moore
Gwen Moore

Gwen Moore

REP
SEN
WI-4
Yadira Caraveo
Yadira Caraveo

Yadira Caraveo

REP
SEN
CO-8
Lloyd Doggett
Lloyd Doggett

Lloyd Doggett

REP
SEN
TX-37
Gary Peters
Gary Peters

Gary Peters

REP
SEN
MI
Judy Chu
Judy Chu

Judy Chu

REP
SEN
CA-28
Colin Allred
Colin Allred

Colin Allred

REP
SEN
TX-32
Mazie Hirono
Mazie Hirono

Mazie Hirono

REP
SEN
HI
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5

Republican

Builders
Dividers
of the week
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Lori Chavez-DeRemer

Lori Chavez-DeRemer

REP
SEN
OR-5
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Mary Miller

Mary Miller

REP
SEN
IL-15
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Brian Fitzpatrick

Brian Fitzpatrick

REP
SEN
PA-1
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Lance Gooden

Lance Gooden

REP
SEN
TX-5
Builders Power Ranking Logo
James Moylan

James Moylan

REP
SEN
GU-0
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Jason Smith

Jason Smith

REP
SEN
MO-8
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Cathy McMorris Rodgers

Cathy McMorris Rodgers

REP
SEN
WA-5
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Josh Brecheen

Josh Brecheen

REP
SEN
OK-2
Builders Power Ranking Logo
John Duarte

John Duarte

REP
SEN
CA-13
Andrew Clyde

Andrew Clyde

REP
SEN
GA-9

Democrat

Builders
dividers
of the week
Jon Ossoff
Jon Ossoff

Jon Ossoff

REP
SEN
GA
Eric Swalwell
Eric Swalwell

Eric Swalwell

REP
SEN
CA-14
Lucy McBath
Lucy McBath

Lucy McBath

REP
SEN
GA-7
Mark Pocan
Mark Pocan

Mark Pocan

REP
SEN
WI-2
Maggie Hassan
Maggie Hassan

Maggie Hassan

REP
SEN
NH
Jim McGovern
Jim McGovern

Jim McGovern

REP
SEN
MA-2
Sharice Davids
Sharice Davids

Sharice Davids

REP
SEN
KS-3
Sheldon Whitehouse
Sheldon Whitehouse

Sheldon Whitehouse

REP
SEN
RI
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez

Marie Gluesenkamp Perez

REP
SEN
WA-3
Ayanna Pressley
Ayanna Pressley

Ayanna Pressley

REP
SEN
MA-7
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5

Republican

Builders
Dividers
of the week
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Lori Chavez-DeRemer

Lori Chavez-DeRemer

REP
SEN
OR-5
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Lance Gooden

Lance Gooden

REP
SEN
TX-5
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Brian Fitzpatrick

Brian Fitzpatrick

REP
SEN
PA-1
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Mary Miller

Mary Miller

REP
SEN
IL-15
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Zach Nunn

Zach Nunn

REP
SEN
IA-3
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Tom Tiffany

Tom Tiffany

REP
SEN
WI-7
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Young Kim

Young Kim

REP
SEN
CA-40
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Brian Babin

Brian Babin

REP
SEN
TX-36
Builders Power Ranking Logo
Mike Carey

Mike Carey

REP
SEN
OH-15
Andrew Clyde

Andrew Clyde

REP
SEN
GA-9

builders

dividers

Panelist Commentary of the week

Our panelists bring to the table a broad range of views on issues, policy, and the role of government itself. Their insights can help audiences evaluate politician’s words and actions with greater nuance and are essential to understanding the data more completely.

Malynda Hale

Actress, Activist, Content Creator

Daniel Lubetzky

Founder of KIND Snacks

Benji Backer

Founder and Executive Chairman, American Conservation Coalition

That's one of the things that when I get very upset about politics, is that we're not focusing on what we can do for the people. We're only focusing on what the opposing person can't do.

Malynda Hale
Read More

The work that Zachary Nunn is doing specifically around breast cancer, I have friends' parents that have died from breast cancer and so seeing that initiative be a highlight for him was something that I hadn't even know that anybody was focusing on.

Malynda Hale
Read More

It's completely fair game in politics that if you want your party to be in power, you need to get control of the Senate or the House. It's completely fair for you to advocate on behalf of your party. It'd be really silly for us to think otherwise.

Daniel Lubetzky
Read More

The principle is that you defend against somebody and then in order to defend you need to punch back hard. I have no problem with it. It's necessary sometimes to have the courage to stand up to the bullies.

Daniel Lubetzky
Read More

If you're focused on dividing people, if you're focused on getting viral on social media, if you're focused on getting a news hit because you said something crazy, that takes away all the time towards actually serving your constituents.

Benji Backer
Read More

You should be able to defend yourself against those attacks and also tell people that those aren't true.

Benji Backer
Read More

The Builders Power Ranking Process

Builders Power Ranking scores are generated by AI-powered data analysis utilizing data provided by Polarization Research Lab, a non-profit, non-partisan initiative of Dartmouth, Stanford, and UPenn, combined with the insights of a panel of cross-partisan analysts and commentators.

More on the Process

About the Rankings

About the Builders Movement

But I think Hakeem Jeffries went very, very hard at those comments in part because there are a lot of Haitians in Brooklyn. He was probably getting a lot of folks in his district who were saying, Hey, you have to go up to 11 on this.

But I think Hakeem Jeffries went very, very hard at those comments in part because there are a lot of Haitians in Brooklyn. He was probably getting a lot of folks in his district who were saying, Hey, you have to go up to 11 on this. And I think most of us regard Hakeem Jeffries as a good, principled, even-handed rational type of leader. And it's hard when the majority leader or minority leader right now - I guess they want to be the majority leader in November - does get rhetorically very heated. I don't think that's a good thing for the country, but I understand exactly why he did it because of the incentives at stake for him.

The fact is that the district's leaning a little bit not in your favor, then you say, Hey, bipartisanship, I think you'll see that pattern.

The fact is that the district's leaning a little bit not in your favor, then you say, Hey, bipartisanship, I think you'll see that pattern. I mean, if you have a district where you have an advantage, then you probably don't have to talk about that as much. So I think that's what you're going to see with folks in tight races where if the prevailing sentiment in that district is for the other party, then you become very, very bipartisan very quickly.

I think personally, gerrymandering social media and cable news have been the problem in this country, which has accelerated [divisive behavior]. And, if you combine them together, it creates a really toxic situation.

I think personally, gerrymandering social media and cable news have been the problem in this country, which has accelerated [divisive behavior]. And if you combine them together, it creates a really toxic situation. So if you're in a gerrymandered area, you have every incentive, especially among the GOP, to be as antagonistic as possible - and to be very performative...I'll use Marjorie Taylor Greene because she uses social media and all these things in that way. When she's away from that, she's perfectly reasonable from what I understand. And so it's all performative.

But on some level you have to be an adult... I mean, it's fine if the tech moguls want to be adult toddlers, but there is some level of being an adult and not responding.

But on some level you have to be an adult... I mean, it's fine if the tech moguls want to be adult toddlers, but there is some level of being an adult and not responding. I would agree with Karl. [Hakeem Jeffries] shouldn't have responded, even if it's a political time. It lessens him and it drags him down.

I was struck by one of the Builders who's not in a tough race, who went out of his way to compliment somebody on the other side - Westerman of Arkansas and Porter of California.

I was struck by one of the Builders who's not in a tough race, who went out of his way to compliment somebody on the other side - Westerman of Arkansas and Porter of California. Westerman is carrying a bill that has to do with federal forests, and he goes out of his way to say, Porter didn't vote for it, but I really appreciate her working on the bill, which means he was listening to somebody on the other side who basically at the end of the day said, I'm not going to be able to vote for the bill, but will you listen to me about my concerns about it and do something about them? And for my time in the White House, I think probably the most powerful lesson I learned was that it's the responsibility of leaders to do exactly that.

[Hakeem Jeffries] is the leader of the Democratic Party in the last month of an election, and he's attempting to become the leader, the speaker, I'm willing to give him some leeway sometimes you have to do things as the leader of your party, which means taking a torch to the other side

Well, look, he [Hakeem Jeffries] is the leader of the Democratic Party in the last month of an election, and he's attempting to become the leader, the speaker, and so I'm willing to give him some leeway because sometimes you have to do things as the leader of your party, which means taking a torch to the other side...But look, we're never going to clean up politics altogether because, after all, its politics. But I just think it would've been stronger had he kept his focus on Clay Higgins and his reprehensible comment.

I think those who are in a tight, tight race tend to claim that they're more bipartisan sometimes than they really are.

I think those who are in a tight, tight race tend to claim that they're more bipartisan sometimes than they really are. And I think it's important not just to look at the bipartisan legislation that they may have co-sponsored or sponsored, but also take a look at the votes and how they actually vote. Sometimes there's a real disconnect between the two. So, I think it's really important that we're having this conversation so that American voters can be better informed and also to nudge those members of Congress in the right direction so that we can have more constructive conversation in the United States.

I think Ossoff from Georgia, a democrat senator, did a great job and led his state responsibly.

I think Ossoff from Georgia, a democrat senator, did a great job and led his state responsibly. He knows very well that agriculture is one of the largest exports from the state. Peanut crops. Cotton crops have both been negatively affected, some destroyed. I've read reports that up to 30% of the cotton crops have been destroyed in his state. Up to 20% of the peanut crops have been destroyed in his state. So in sponsoring bipartisan legislation that would bring aid to those farmers in his state, really important. Great job. I'm glad to hear more members of Congress are jumping on that.

I would've expected that Speaker Johnson would be at the top of the divider's list because he has refused the president's call to call Congress back before the election to refund some recovery efforts for the FEMA response.

I would've expected that Speaker Johnson would be at the top of the divider's list because he has refused the president's call to call Congress back before the election to refund some recovery efforts for the FEMA response. And to me, that would be a bipartisan motion, a bipartisan effort. Hurricanes don't differentiate between parties, and the speaker has refused to do that so far and has not agreed to.

You're seeing a lot of members of Congress coming together and saying that this is the time to put party politics aside and help their constituents.

You're seeing a lot of members of Congress coming together and saying that this is the time to put party politics aside and help their constituents. But traditionally in American politics, it was the standard. It was just standard to put politics aside and try to get aid to as many of your constituents as possible. I think about even Chris Christie a few years ago in the last election cycle when Hurricane Sandy hit his state and he did whatever he could to get federal funding from President Obama…I think we should try to hold what building is to an even higher standard of actually doing what Heather's embraced, which is John Ossoff working with other members of the other party to get legislation done.

I actually thought that the Republican builders really missed a number of Republican members of Congress who actually showed some leadership this week with the Hurricane Helene recovery efforts with the Hurricane Milton recovery efforts.

I actually thought that the Republican builders really missed a number of Republican members of Congress who actually showed some leadership this week with the Hurricane Helene recovery efforts with the Hurricane Milton recovery efforts. For example, Chuck Edwards in North Carolina sent out an email blast to his supporters essentially saying and debunking a lot of the Hurricane Helene misinformation out there, especially some of the misinformation pushed by his own party like members like Marjorie Taylor Greene.

I do think that we are too distracted with our internal divisions because oftentimes right now when it comes to an election, we're discussing whether or not we can trust our own intelligence community...

I do think that we are too distracted with our internal divisions because oftentimes right now when it comes to an election, we're discussing whether or not we can trust our own intelligence community and what is coming out of our intelligence community because that is the rhetoric being propped up by some of these dividers on the Republican side versus let's talk about the real issue of how foreign powers have interfered with our last several elections dating back to 2016 and likely even before.

I think there's a difference between being nasty in campaign rhetoric and pointing out nasty things and nasty policies.

I think generally speaking, Congressman Allred is more moderate than a lot of Democrats in the House caucus. And yes, he's running for Senate in Texas and he's going against Ted Cruz, but I think there's a difference between being nasty in campaign rhetoric and pointing out nasty things and nasty policies. And I think for Allred, what he was doing was more the latter. A campaign is a campaign. Elbows get sharp in them, but I did not see the kind of name calling or real nastiness in that debate with Ted Cruz that you see from other candidates. I saw him trying to make a clear contrast for the people of Texas, so I wouldn't hit him on that.

I think that it is not being a divider to point out something that is true. It's been an ongoing issue where everything the members are elected to do has been stalled by party politics, partisan politics. And I think that's what Congresswoman Moore is pointing out here.

I think that it is not being a divider to point out something that is true. It's been an ongoing issue where everything the members are elected to do has been stalled by party politics, partisan politics. And I think that's what Congresswoman Moore is pointing out here. She didn't call anybody a name, she didn't refer to any one person she was expressing frustration to. She's expressing frustration about something that has become a hallmark of Congress, which is inaction, gridlock and partisan bickering. And I think that is telling the truth.

I think if we're going to honor Builders, you need to be building towards something with courage.

I think if we're going to honor Builders, you need to be building towards something with courage. I think mostly what I'm seeing here is people who, because they're in a purple state, especially now, are being very nice to the other side even though a lot of them on both sides have only voted with their side most of the time. And when they do go with the other side, it's something kind of small, spending money on a nice thing to help people that looks good for the election, but it's not courageously fighting a special interest. It's not courageously going against the things that you might say are more broken on their side, whether it's the right or the left.

Studying Colin Allred's effort, I think the only things he comes across the aisle on is more speaking about the border because he is on a border state in Texas, but if you actually look at his voting record, it's pretty much consistently with Schumer.

Studying Colin Allred's effort, I think the only things he comes across the aisle on is more speaking about the border because he is on a border state in Texas, but if you actually look at his voting record, it's pretty much consistently with Schumer. If you're on the left, you might agree with Colin on all these things, but when it comes up, for example, to stopping BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) something a lot of Democrats went across the aisle on, he did not go across the aisle, right? When it came to stopping, bailing out extreme left cities, something very popular in Texas to do, he did not go across the aisle. On top of that, it was very nasty exchange both from both him and Ted Cruz attacking each other really vehemently, really personally, to me that obviously doesn't exemplify what I think we're trying to do here…so I was pretty shocked to see his name, especially this week on this list. I think that's really inappropriate.

The fact is that we're having this conversation two weeks before one of the hottest elections in US history. It definitely affects all the statements and behavior of various actors.

The fact is that we're having this conversation two weeks before one of the hottest elections in US history. It definitely affects all the statements and behavior of various actors. And it's very natural that the Builders come from the districts where they have to compete for independence or even just having hoped to get some votes from the other side. While those we call Dividers, they come from the safe seats.

Whether they agree and disagree with his criticism of Biden's policy on Iran, I think everybody should be able to criticize a president.

I disagree that Jason Smith, in his latest statement on policy, would actually contribute to his status as a Divider, although he had many other records [of that] in the past. But whether you like or not, whether they agree and disagree with his criticism of Biden's policy on Iran, I think everybody should be able to criticize a president.

That's one of the things that when I get very upset about politics, is that we're not focusing on what we can do for the people. We're only focusing on what the opposing person can't do.

I definitely was disappointed with Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA). I will be honest with that. I think it's counterproductive and I think it's a waste of time to do the ad that he did. If you're a Democrat, you should be focusing on what Kamala Harris can bring to the table and not continuously focusing on what Donald Trump does and doesn't do. That's one of the things that when I get very upset about politics, is that we're not focusing on what we can do for the people. We're only focusing on what the opposing person can't do.

The work that Zachary Nunn is doing specifically around breast cancer, I have friends' parents that have died from breast cancer and so seeing that initiative be a highlight for him was something that I hadn't even know that anybody was focusing on.

The work that Zachary Nunn is doing specifically around breast cancer, I have friends' parents that have died from breast cancer and so seeing that initiative be a highlight for him was something that I hadn't even know that anybody was focusing on. I would've loved to see, especially with October being Breast Cancer Awareness month, I would've loved to see more of that in the media and more focus on the initiatives that he's trying to do in terms of healthcare.

It's completely fair game in politics that if you want your party to be in power, you need to get control of the Senate or the House. It's completely fair for you to advocate on behalf of your party. It'd be really silly for us to think otherwise.

It's completely fair game in politics that if you want your party to be in power, you need to get control of the Senate or the House. It's completely fair for you to advocate on behalf of your party. It'd be really silly for us to think otherwise. That's how politics operate. How you do that matters a lot in everything you do. And so, if you're trying to substantively explain why these are your policies and they're superior to the people's policies, of course you should do that…but when you are engaging in tactics that are immoral for whatever reason, by whatever party, that's when you lose that credibility.

The principle is that you defend against somebody and then in order to defend you need to punch back hard. I have no problem with it. It's necessary sometimes to have the courage to stand up to the bullies.

The beginning of the website, it's just actually defending himself from his opponent's attacks. Now, I don't know who Lanon (Baccam) is, and maybe I should be more sophisticated and all this stuff, but the principle is that you defend against somebody and then in order to defend you need to punch back hard. I have no problem with it. It's necessary sometimes to have the courage to stand up to the bullies.

If you're focused on dividing people, if you're focused on getting viral on social media, if you're focused on getting a news hit because you said something crazy, that takes away all the time towards actually serving your constituents.

Members of Congress are like every other person where they only have so much time in the day, and they have to prioritize their time. And if you're focused on dividing people, if you're focused on getting viral on social media, if you're focused on getting a news hit because you said something crazy, that takes away all the time towards actually serving your constituents. And so, a lot of people might say, well, it's okay. It's just a front. They're just trying to get a name ID, they're just trying to raise money, whatever the problem with it is, obviously, even if you don't have a problem with that, it's taking away from all the time that they could spend actually solving problems. The people who don't have big name IDs are utilizing their time, which is their biggest capital that they have, but most limited capital on actually solving problems, which is why we don't know who they are.

You should be able to defend yourself against those attacks and also tell people that those aren't true.

You should be able to defend yourself against those attacks and also tell people that those aren't true. What I mean, if he's being lied about at that level, then he shouldn't go and lie about his opponent at that level too. And I think that that's what I see too often is that that's how they justify it.